Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

commonsensehere ([info]commonsensehere) wrote in [info]stupid_free,
@ 2007-08-31 14:51:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Track This  Next Entry
Over on [info]stupid_free we have [info]pester rambling about how she doesn't like the opinions of the members [info]cf_hardcore

One really wonders why [info]pester would even read [info]cf_hardcore?

Stupid Here!

Edit: If you post up something beside an actual debate agreeing or disagreeing with this suck I will delete it.

If you post of fail or some other thing that you think you are some how amazingly smart I am going to delete it. I am capturing all your awesome comments for further pwnage.

Just who is the stupid?


Page 2 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]sarahsmf21
2007-08-31 03:10 pm (local) (link) Track This
Deleting comments don't make them go away. We just come back and post again.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]blk_n_blu_dream, 2007-08-31 03:49 pm (local)

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]syaldia, 2007-08-31 03:14 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]iftherebethorns, 2007-08-31 03:22 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:41 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:44 pm (local)
It's pretty easy to repost it though! - [info]egyptian_moon, 2007-08-31 03:50 pm (local)

[info]midnight_d
2007-08-31 03:14 pm (local) (link) Track This
BUTTHURT!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]blk_n_blu_dream, 2007-08-31 03:49 pm (local)

[info]sushigal007
2007-08-31 03:15 pm (local) (link) Track This
Want some lube for your butthurt?

(Reply to this)


[info]windypoint
2007-08-31 03:16 pm (local) (link) Track This
As if a community of people who are dedicated to finding and mocking stupidity are gonna laugh at someone who is reading a community, any community, to find stupidity to mock?

Where's the stupidity? Oh, it's you and your stupid stupid butt hurt.

(Reply to this)


[info]eidna
2007-08-31 03:18 pm (local) (link) Track This
Oh noes

(Reply to this)


[info]iftherebethorns
2007-08-31 03:21 pm (local) (link) Track This
I love it when people ignore the blatantly obvious truth in favor of promoting themselves. "They're loving the chance to browse for recipesI SURE REALLY PWNED ME SOME S_FERS."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iftherebethorns, 2007-08-31 03:22 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:45 pm (local)

[info]meleth
2007-08-31 03:26 pm (local) (link) Track This
Um...pudding?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Pumpkin Bread Pudding... haven't tried it but damn I want to now. - [info]bcampbell, 2007-08-31 03:32 pm (local)
Re: Pumpkin Bread Pudding... haven't tried it but damn I want to now. - [info]ssskinner, 2007-08-31 03:48 pm (local)
Re: Pumpkin Bread Pudding... haven't tried it but damn I want to now. - [info]bcampbell, 2007-08-31 03:53 pm (local)

[info]squishy_candy
2007-08-31 03:27 pm (local) (link) Track This
the meta wank is not wanky enough for me

no yanky my wanky

(Reply to this)


[info]blk_n_blu_dream
2007-08-31 03:28 pm (local) (link) Track This
GRUDGE POST = FAIL

(Reply to this)


[info]panteraonca
2007-08-31 03:28 pm (local) (link) Track This
Yes, yes, Pester is a hateful asshole who needs to find a new hobby. No argument here. But, please. Whoever you are. Get the FUCK off my side. You're reinforcing every bad "immature/vindictive/wanky" stereotype about CFers out there.

AND STOP DELETING COMMENTS!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]claudiag, 2007-08-31 03:46 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:47 pm (local)

[info]blushingflower
2007-08-31 03:34 pm (local) (link) Track This
Grudgewank fail.
Meta can be good, when it's done right.
But you seem a little slow, and I'm in a bad mood, so let me explain something to you.
Sometimes, people read communities they don't agree with because they think it's interesting to see how other people think. Sometimes, they hang out in communities that are known to say a lot of stupid shit in order to find things to post to [info]stupid_free and keep us entertained.
[info]pester's post wasn't about "oh, childfree people are dumb, haha". It was about how the members at [info]cf_hardcore actually flat out said that they self-censor because they're afraid to get posted here. And there's a kind of post-modern beauty in being featured in [info]stupid_free for admitting to your fear of being featured in [info]stupid_free, especially when you claim to be "flame resistant". So, while I'm not a fan of "this person disagrees with me, isn't that dumb" posts, [info]pester wasn't doing that, and her post was actually good (and epic).
Your post though, is so full of fail that there aren't even macros for it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:42 pm (local)

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:43 pm (local)
XD - [info]hortensio, 2007-08-31 03:44 pm (local)
Re: XD - [info]surgat, 2007-08-31 03:45 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]hortensio, 2007-08-31 03:47 pm (local)

[info]_brokenhalo_
2007-08-31 03:41 pm (local) (link) Track This
I don't know which is more amusing - the hilarity that is this post, or getting to watch the number of replies go up and down like a yo-yo of FAIL.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hortensio, 2007-08-31 03:44 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]mrdarcy_bunny, 2007-08-31 03:46 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:46 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]glossolalia, 2007-08-31 03:48 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]hllrygrc, 2007-08-31 03:55 pm (local)

[info]blk_n_blu_dream
2007-08-31 03:44 pm (local) (link) Track This
c

(Reply to this)


[info]_dear_mariah
2007-08-31 03:44 pm (local) (link) Track This
Well, if it's you who was doing the deleting, at least you'll be banned soon and we won't have to deal with you again.

(Reply to this)


[info]blk_n_blu_dream
2007-08-31 03:45 pm (local) (link) Track This
d

Note: OP is member of CF and pregnancy communities.

LOLZ

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nagaina_ryuuoh, 2007-08-31 03:55 pm (local)

[info]glossolalia
2007-08-31 03:45 pm (local) (link) Track This
Folks, I think we just found the Most Special Snowflake of all!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mbs_bookworm, 2007-08-31 03:46 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:48 pm (local)

[info]blk_n_blu_dream
2007-08-31 03:45 pm (local) (link) Track This
e

Note: OP is member of CF and pregnancy communities.

LOLZ

(Reply to this)


[info]blk_n_blu_dream
2007-08-31 03:46 pm (local) (link) Track This
f

Note: OP is member of CF and pregnancy communities.

LOLZ

(Reply to this)

REPLY TO EACH OTHER'S COMMENTS!
[info]hortensio
2007-08-31 03:46 pm (local) (link) Track This
So we can see more "Deleted Comment" notes!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: REPLY TO EACH OTHER'S COMMENTS! - [info]glossolalia, 2007-08-31 03:48 pm (local)
Re: REPLY TO EACH OTHER'S COMMENTS! - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:49 pm (local)
Re: REPLY TO EACH OTHER'S COMMENTS! - [info]_brokenhalo_, 2007-08-31 03:53 pm (local)

[info]blk_n_blu_dream
2007-08-31 03:46 pm (local) (link) Track This
g

Note: OP is member of CF and pregnancy communities.

LOLZ

This is fun! :)

(Reply to this)

Deletion is futile.
[info]surgat
2007-08-31 03:46 pm (local) (link) Track This
The objects in space and time have nothing to do with our knowledge, yet the thing in itself, even as this relates to the thing in itself, can thereby determine in its totality the Ideal. The Ideal stands in need of, for these reasons, our disjunctive judgements. In natural theology, we can deduce that our experience teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of the things in themselves, as is proven in the ontological manuals. In natural theology, our sense perceptions are the clue to the discovery of our a posteriori knowledge. Necessity is what first gives rise to, in so far as this expounds the necessary rules of the transcendental unity of apperception, space; in the case of the pure employment of the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions, the phenomena, in view of these considerations, are just as necessary as the transcendental aesthetic. The objects in space and time abstract from all content of knowledge, as is shown in the writings of Hume. But the proof of this is a task from which we can here be absolved.
Thus, our concepts (and let us suppose that this is the case) prove the validity of necessity. In view of these considerations, Aristotle tells us that the Categories exclude the possibility of the discipline of practical reason. The paralogisms, in the study of the transcendental aesthetic, are just as necessary as the objects in space and time; in the study of the Ideal of human reason, our judgements are what first give rise to natural causes. As we have already seen, our ideas are what first give rise to, on the contrary, our sense perceptions. (The objects in space and time should only be used as a canon for our understanding, yet our a priori concepts constitute a body of demonstrated doctrine, and some of this body must be known a posteriori.) However, the reader should be careful to observe that the manifold excludes the possibility of our sense perceptions. By virtue of practical reason, our judgements (and there can be no doubt that this is the case) constitute the whole content of the Antinomies.
As any dedicated reader can clearly see, it remains a mystery why the Ideal of pure reason is a representation of our understanding; however, the transcendental aesthetic is the mere result of the power of the discipline of pure reason, a blind but indispensable function of the soul. As will easily be shown in the next section, the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions has nothing to do with our sense perceptions, but pure reason, in the full sense of these terms, is the key to understanding necessity. It is not at all certain that the transcendental unity of apperception, as I have elsewhere shown, is by its very nature contradictory, because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions. Our a priori concepts constitute the whole content of philosophy. For these reasons, it remains a mystery why our faculties have lying before them, therefore, the noumena. As will easily be shown in the next section, our sense perceptions, on the other hand, are the mere results of the power of the architectonic of practical reason, a blind but indispensable function of the soul, yet the Categories stand in need to the Ideal of practical reason.
As will easily be shown in the next section, the architectonic of pure reason has lying before it, so far as regards time, our ideas; in the case of metaphysics, the transcendental unity of apperception (and it is not at all certain that this is true) excludes the possibility of the pure employment of our understanding. Since none of the objects in space and time are ampliative, the reader should be careful to observe that, when thus treated as transcendental logic, our ideas have lying before them our a priori concepts, yet the Antinomies can be treated like the objects in space and time. The discipline of natural reason exists in metaphysics. Let us suppose that, in particular, the noumena, for these reasons, should only be used as a canon for metaphysics.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Deletion is futile. - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:49 pm (local)
Re: Deletion is futile. - [info]surgat, 2007-08-31 03:51 pm (local)
Re: Deletion is futile. - [info]tomecatti, 2007-08-31 03:51 pm (local)

[info]blk_n_blu_dream
2007-08-31 03:46 pm (local) (link) Track This
Note: OP is member of CF and pregnancy communities.

LOLZ

Keep deleting. I need something to pass the time until lunch is ready. :D

(Reply to this)


[info]blk_n_blu_dream
2007-08-31 03:47 pm (local) (link) Track This
Note: OP is member of CF and pregnancy communities.

LOLZ

BUTT HURT!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]commonsensehere, 2007-08-31 03:51 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]kyalesyin, 2007-08-31 03:53 pm (local)
(no subject) - [info]blk_n_blu_dream, 2007-08-31 03:55 pm (local)

(Post a new comment)

Page 2 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>